<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google releases revised iPhone version of iGoogle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/</link>
	<description>Mac, technology, and web design blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 12:47:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuckyMan</title>
		<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>LuckyMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoholic.ca/?p=174#comment-48</guid>
		<description>It sucks. However www.google.com/ig/i still works on a desktop browser - which gives me a glimmer of hope that it still might be a mistake (surely they would have removed that page if they were scrapping support for it). Possible that &#039;Paul&#039; who responded on the Google support forums  was misinformed. Trying to stay optimistic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sucks. However <a href="http://www.google.com/ig/i" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/ig/i</a> still works on a desktop browser &#8211; which gives me a glimmer of hope that it still might be a mistake (surely they would have removed that page if they were scrapping support for it). Possible that &#8216;Paul&#8217; who responded on the Google support forums  was misinformed. Trying to stay optimistic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dusty59</title>
		<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>dusty59</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoholic.ca/?p=174#comment-45</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, it stinks. I&#039;ve been searching around for info on it- there&#039;s a few threads on google support forums. google needs to reverse this bs decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, it stinks. I&#8217;ve been searching around for info on it- there&#8217;s a few threads on google support forums. google needs to reverse this bs decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iGoogle for iPhone is gone: Google, you suck &#124; technoholic.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>iGoogle for iPhone is gone: Google, you suck &#124; technoholic.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoholic.ca/?p=174#comment-43</guid>
		<description>[...] it seems that what I thought was a revision to iGoogle for the iPhone was in fact just Google redirecting everyone to the standard iGoogle mobile version, dropping the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it seems that what I thought was a revision to iGoogle for the iPhone was in fact just Google redirecting everyone to the standard iGoogle mobile version, dropping the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoholic.ca/?p=174#comment-42</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re totally right. I guess I&#039;ve never seem the standard iGoogle mobile before. In any case, it still totally sucks compared to what we iPhone users used to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re totally right. I guess I&#8217;ve never seem the standard iGoogle mobile before. In any case, it still totally sucks compared to what we iPhone users used to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scape</title>
		<link>http://www.technoholic.ca/google-releases-revised-iphone-version-of-igoogle/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Scape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technoholic.ca/?p=174#comment-41</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that iphone version doesnt work and we (iphone users) see standard mobile version.  If i open article page from igoogle it is formated for  mobiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that iphone version doesnt work and we (iphone users) see standard mobile version.  If i open article page from igoogle it is formated for  mobiles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

